Gigabyte X38-DS5 review & X38T-DQ6 revisit

November 6, 2007 | 13:43

Tags: #analysis #benchmark #crossfire #ddr2 #ds5 #ga #heatpipes #motherboard #overclocking #review #testing #x38

Companies: #ati #gigabyte #intel

Xvid Encoding:

We tested video encoding performance using VirtualDub-MPEG version 1.6.15 and a multi-threaded version of the Xvid codec, along with the LAME MT MP3 encoder for encoding audio. We did a two-pass encode of a 15-minute 276MB digital TV recording with a target file size of 100MB.

Xvid Encoding

VirtualDub MPEG-2 1.6.15, Xvid 1.2 beta, 276MB .mpg to 100MB .avi

  • Gigabyte GA-X38-DS5 - 7900 GTX
  • Gigabyte GA-X38-DS5 - X1900 CF
  • Gigabyte GA-X38T-DQ6 - 7900 GTX
  • Gigabyte GA-X38T-DQ6 - X1900 CF
  • Asus Maximus Formula - 7900 GTX
  • Asus Maximus Formula - X1900 CF
  • Abit IP35 Pro - 7900 GTX
  • Abit IP35 Pro - X1900 CF
  • 734.3
  • 738.0
  • 725.0
  • 723.3
  • 728.3
  • 733.3
  • 733.7
  • 616.0
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Time in Seconds (lower is better)

The performance during an Xvid encode is usually heavily memory bandwidth dependent, however the Gigabyte boards offer up a consistently fast result and hold their own against the other boards. The DDR3 X38T-DQ6 is several seconds quicker than the DDR2 boards, but there's really not much to call between them. Again, Abit IP35-Pro has the CrossFire performance hooked up nicely in a consistently super-fast result that stands out from the rest of the field.

MP3 Encoding:

We used LAME MT for our audio encoding test - it's the multi-threaded version of the popular LAME MP3 encoder. We ran tests with both Intel's and Microsoft's compilers - naturally, the Intel compiler resulted in some performance increases on Intel's processors. We converted all 18 tracks from Moby's popular Play album to a 192kbps variable bit-rate MP3.

MP3 Encoding (Intel)

LAME MT 3.97, Moby - Play, .wav to 192kbps .mp3, Intel Compiler

  • Gigabyte GA-X38-DS5 - 7900 GTX
  • Gigabyte GA-X38-DS5 - X1900 CF
  • Gigabyte GA-X38T-DQ6 - 7900 GTX
  • Gigabyte GA-X38T-DQ6 - X1900 CF
  • Asus Maximus Formula - 7900 GTX
  • Asus Maximus Formula - X1900 CF
  • Abit IP35 Pro - 7900 GTX
  • Abit IP35 Pro - X1900 CF
  • 88.0
  • 87.0
  • 87.3
  • 88.7
  • 116.3
  • 117.0
  • 114.3
  • 94.7
0
25
50
75
100
125
Time in Seconds (lower is better)

MP3 Encoding (Microsoft)

LAME MT 3.97, Moby - Play, .wav to 192kbps .mp3, MS Compiler

  • Gigabyte GA-X38-DS5 - 7900 GTX
  • Gigabyte GA-X38-DS5 - X1900 CF
  • Gigabyte GA-X38T-DQ6 - 7900 GTX
  • Gigabyte GA-X38T-DQ6 - X1900 CF
  • Asus Maximus Formula - 7900 GTX
  • Asus Maximus Formula - X1900 CF
  • Abit IP35 Pro - 7900 GTX
  • Abit IP35 Pro - X1900 CF
  • 96.0
  • 96.0
  • 96.0
  • 95.7
  • 122.3
  • 125.0
  • 123.0
  • 98.0
0
25
50
75
100
125
Time in Seconds (lower is better)

Gigabyte seems to be doing something right with MP3 encoding though, performing 20 to 30 seconds faster than the Asus and Abit boards (except for when the Abit uses multi-GPU, again). This is somewhat anomalous considering the small file compression result - so we double checked that the files were correct and the encoding was accurate, which it was, so it is a genuine result.

MP3 Decoding


MP3 Decoding (Intel)

LAME MT 3.97, Moby - Play, .192KHz .mp3 to .wav, Intel Compiler

  • Gigabyte GA-X38-DS5 - 7900 GTX
  • Gigabyte GA-X38-DS5 - X1900 CF
  • Gigabyte GA-X38T-DQ6 - 7900 GTX
  • Gigabyte GA-X38T-DQ6 - X1900 CF
  • Asus Maximus Formula - 7900 GTX
  • Asus Maximus Formula - X1900 CF
  • Abit IP35 Pro - 7900 GTX
  • Abit IP35 Pro - X1900 CF
  • 28.3
  • 27.5
  • 29.7
  • 28.0
  • 36.3
  • 35.7
  • 39.0
  • 35.3
0
10
20
30
40
Time in Seconds (lower is better)

MP3 Decoding (Microsoft)

LAME MT 3.97, Moby - Play, .192KHz .mp3 to .wav, MS Compiler

  • Gigabyte GA-X38-DS5 - 7900 GTX
  • Gigabyte GA-X38-DS5 - X1900 CF
  • Gigabyte GA-X38T-DQ6 - 7900 GTX
  • Gigabyte GA-X38T-DQ6 - X1900 CF
  • Asus Maximus Formula - 7900 GTX
  • Asus Maximus Formula - X1900 CF
  • Abit IP35 Pro - 7900 GTX
  • Abit IP35 Pro - X1900 CF
  • 29.7
  • 29.5
  • 30.7
  • 30.3
  • 38.7
  • 37.7
  • 42.3
  • 33.0
0
10
20
30
40
Time in Seconds (lower is better)

In decoding again both the Gigabyte boards are several seconds faster then the Asus and Abit boards, even in such a short test. Obviously if you're heavily into your audio encoding, Gigabyte seems to be the way to go.
Discuss this in the forums
YouTube logo
MSI MPG Velox 100R Chassis Review

October 14 2021 | 15:04